Michael Filloon has a recent five-part series of articles over at Seeking Alpha on investing for potential of EPA regulation of fracking in the near future as a result of public concerns about water usage and contamination. Below is a synopsis of his excellent analysis, but for a more in depth assessment of how to invest, be sure to check out his writing.

Hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” is an industry practice of pumping a pressurized mixture of water, quartz sand, and proprietary chemicals. An average well requires 80,000 gallons of water for drilling, the fracturing process requires 3.8 million gallons of frac mixture, and one million gallons of water is returned to the surface and is currently trucked to treatment centers. Various environmental groups are concerned with the use of millions of gallons of water and the potential to contaminate the local ground water.

While the industry is too vital and too profitable to be affected by these concerns, this could lead to epa regulations and fracking changes. These changes will affect other elements of the industry including transportation of frack water, on-site clean water supply equipment, and alternative fracking fluids. These changes are where the opportunity to profit lies.

Concern from groundwater pollution has not officially been deemed an issue by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). There is precedent for concern though. Chesapeake contaminated 16 families’ drinking water and was ordered to pay $900,000 and Encana has to provide safe drinking water for 21 households. A Denbury well reported leaking at one of its sites. There were no issues with the leak found, but it opens the possibility in the minds of the public.

So what areas of change are expected to receive tighter regulations? One is the proper placement of cement casings to prevent accidental leaks. Another could be dimensional and structural pits for catching leaks and runoffs and containing them. The third is the chemicals that go into fracking fluids. The fracking recipes are tightly held by the industry, but a push to safe or biodegradable chemicals is likely. Fourth is a separation and processing of frac water so the water can be returned to the natural supply. Fifth is the amount of frac water allowed to be left underground when the process is complete. Recognizing these upcoming changes leave opportunities for profit if you find the correct industries early.

You have to role-play in your mind a little the effect of these likely changes. If the majority of the changes is a push to returning fresh water to the local water supply what industries will this impact? One would think companies that are creating onsite treatment centers like General Electric (GE) and its mobile evaporators. Mobile treatment centers would remove sand and grit (with the possibility of reuse), remove metals, kill bacteria, and remove salts. This water could then be reused for another well at the same site.

If the producers of these mobile treatment plants can prove that the process pays for themselves with reduced transportation and treatment costs you will see a very fast rate of growth in the industry. It would also suggest bearish sentiment on transport companies that profit by transporting the water (currently about 200 trucks per well) offsite to be stores or treated. If the majority of the impact is in output regulation, that would suggest bullish sentiment on companies that provide testing like Xylem because it may be cheaper to show that you are not polluting the area then changing your current process.

The more regulations, containment, and treatment required the more expensive the whole process becomes. Eventually this opens the window to research and capital costs associated with changing to new “green” fracking chemicals. Flotek is one company creating new age fracking chemicals called microemulsifiers has already gained traction before new regulations. Another chemical play is Newpark with 7.5% market share, but 81% within the United States. Newpark has the potential to expand within the US on green technology and internationally.

To play devil’s advocate to all the smaller company plays is the rate of growth in the industry. The buyer of all these products, the drillers, will want to take advantage of every new well opportunity it is allowed. A killer of many new products is the inability to produce at the rate of growth in the industry. If the political leanings move towards domestic energy production companies like Heckmann Corporation (HEK) which is large, established, and has the ability to respond quickly could be poised to profit because it has the ability to get the wells producing quickly regardless of new technologies. Also, they have the capital to purchase new proven technologies and implement them quickly.

The energy sector has many opportunities to profit. Regulations change the field by breaking the status quo and giving smaller nimble companies the chance to gain market share and kill other industries that haven’t created a flexible business plan. By investing in these companies before the regulations are forced on the industry you can catch the large upside jump when the rest of the investing community piles on. Regardless if you choose to short drillers because there will be more expenses put on them, invest long with chemical companies or on-site water treatment companies, you should not ignore the impact of epa regulations and fracking on the industry.

Summit Energy Services was formed in 2010 to fill the need for logistical services in the Bakken when the oil fields went from exploration to production. Based in Williston, North Dakota, Summit offers a wide array of oil field support that allows rig operators to concentrate on doing what they know best—look for oil—without getting ... Read more >>

Michael Filloon does some excellent analysis and commentary on the Bakken and North Dakota oil over at Seeking Alpha. He recently wrote a four-part series on investing in the Bakken for 2012 that is very good. Below is a synopsis of those articles, but for a more in-depth and quite good analysis of the upcoming ... Read more >>

In this video, Harold Hamm, CEO of Continental Resources Inc. talks about drilling in the Bakken, his estimate of total recoverable oil in the formation, challenges of dealing with the lack of workers and infrastructure, and the future of shale oil and energy independence in North America. It’s a pretty thoughtful interview and definitely worth ... Read more >>

Kodiak Oil And Gas(NYSE:KOG) presented its capital spending plan for the year 2011 toward the end of 2010. It made history by being the company’s biggest projected investment ever at $200 million. Part of their plan was to complete 26 gross wells and drill 28 of them all in North Dakota’s Three Forks and Bakken ... Read more >>

After 2010, Kodiak Oil & Gas (NYSE: KOG) released its capital investment plans for 2011. With $200M allotted for their projects, it is said to be the most significant capital investment in their company history. Kodiak planned to finish 26 gross wells in the Bakken and Three Forks oil plays of North Dakota along with ... Read more >>

Two Canadian companies, Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. and Enbridge Inc., both announced recently that they will be investing heavily in rail shipping capacity for crude oil in the Bakken formation area of North Dakota and Saskatchewan. Oil production in the Bakken increased 28% this past September from a year earlier. Since pipeline capacity is insufficient ... Read more >>

Here’s an interesting post on Seeking Alpha by Matt King on real oil production scenarios from the Bakken oilfield. If you’re not familiar with Seeking Alpha, it’s a great community – basically a collection of user-created blogs of various investing professionals, or just those with an interest in investing. It’s somewhat hit and miss in ... Read more >>

A Look at Top Bakken Oil Companies When a country is in the midst of a huge economic slump the way the United States is right now, it wreaks major havoc on the livelihood of the people who live there. Unemployment skyrockets while wages drop, which only exacerbates the problem with the economy. The lower ... Read more >>